Skip to main content

2024 Week 51: Good deeds

 My grandmother Christina Walker and her husband John McAra had twelve children together during their 59 years of married life. Her first three children did not survive childhood - her firstborn, John, died aged 8 in 1896, her two next born had preceded him, just infants, in 1890 and 1893. Another daughter, Christina, was to die aged only 6 months in 1900. Such a lot of grief for a couple to go through. Losing children was still all too common around this time, but that doesn't make it any the less traumatic. And yet she was to find the compassion to help a child who was not her own.

Christina Walker herself was the second youngest of eleven children. She had married John McAra at the age of 18 in 1887 and her first child was born nine months later. When the baby was just six months old, John was unwell and the young family had to apply for money from the Parish under the Poor Law. Her second child was born early in 1890 and died later on that same year. Meanwhile, her older sister Margaret, the sister she was closest to in age, had also given birth to a baby in 1887, a baby whom she named Jane (Jeannie). Unfortunately, Margaret was unmarried at the time and no father was named on Jeannie's birth certificate.

Birth record for Jane Walker  1887 Source: Scotlands People

 Margaret herself was a farm servant and no doubt she would have needed to resume work as soon as she could. But who would look after baby Jane? That task seems to have been taken on by Margaret's mother, Jane, as shown in the 1891 census, where we find Jane, a widow, Lamont her youngest son and two granddaughters, Jane (Jeannie) now aged 4 and Margaret, aged 1.

1891 census for my great grandmother Jane Walker Source: Scotlands People

 Who is Margaret? -  a second (illegitimate) daughter of Margaret and thus Jane's younger sister! Meanwhile, Margaret herself is not mentioned on the census - maybe she was not at home when the census was taken? maybe she was living elsewhere? So far I haven't been able to find her.

Birth entry for Maggie Walker 1890  Source: Scotlands People

So Jane and her young sister appear to have been taken care of by their grandmother. This was not in itself unusual in those times - and perhaps even now - but it certainly was a kind deed for a widowed  woman in her 60s to take on two young children, even if it was just while the mother had to work.

So what of the mother, Margaret? She next appears in records in December 1892. a year after the census, when she  marries a widower, Matthew Graham, an Irishman and a quarryman by trade, as was Margaret's brother Lamond. Lamond was one of the witnesses to their marriage, so maybe he was even instrumental in bringing them together. In any case, in the years which followed, they go on to have seven children. Interestingly in the 1901 census young Margaret is no longer living with her grandmother, (who had died tragically in a fire at home in 1898,)  but has been taken into the Graham  household and given the surname Graham. Could this be because Matthew Graham was her father? Quite possibly!  Jane on the other hand is not there!

1901 census summary for Margaret and Matthew's family. Source: Ancestry

She is, however, living with another relative - her aunt Christina, my grandmother.


1901 census showing Jeannie living with her aunt Christina's family. Source: Scotlands People

 I have no idea when Jane (Jeannie) moved to live with my grandmother and her ever growing family. Had Jeannie been living with her own grandmother the night of her tragic death or had she moved to stay with my grandmother before then? I doubt I will ever know. However, she lives in my grandparents household until she gets married in 1908 to John Connor, a fireman at a colliery. What a big heart my grandmother, Christina,  must have had to have taken Jeannie in! She herself had a growing family and had also lost children of her own. But from what I have heard from a living relative, Christina treated Jeannie as one of her own.  Why had Jeannie's mother and new husband not taken her in when they married? Possibly because Matthew Graham was not her father. Still, I think Jeannie landed lucky with my grandparents.

I know for a fact that she maintained close links with the family after she married. My dad, John, who wasn't born until 1914 was very fond of Jeannie and was very close to her son James, who was three years older than him, even being the best man at his wedding. As a family, we regularly visited James (Jimmy) and his wife. Jeannie  and her husband ended up living in the family cottage where my dad had been born. Jeannie herself died there in 1957. To this day, the cottage still belongs to one of her grandchildren. 

Wedding of Jane(Jeannie)'s son James Connor. My dad is on the left. Source: family photo

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 Week 43: Lost contact #52Ancestorsin52Weeks

 When we research our ancestors and their families, it is all to easy to become a collector of names, dates and places. After all, we want to 'know' who they were and where they lived and when, in order to get a glimpse into what their life was like. We look for photographs of our most recent ancestors to see what they looked like. We trawl censuses, Poor Law Applications, Wills and Testaments to get some detail about their rank in society, their jobs, their financial circumstances. We discover their families, the children they had, the children they lost. We may read their obituaries and gravestones and scan their death certificates for cause of death. Through research, we can slowly start to build up a picture of them, a notion that we know 'who they were'. But something will usually elude us - we will never truly know their feelings/emotions, even if we know the key moments in their lives. Take my grandmother, Christina, who lost her first four children and then anot...

2024 Week 14: Favourite recipe #52Ancestorsin52Weeks

So, despite the heading, I'm not going to write about a favourite recipe that an ancestor has passed down to me, simply because there isn't one. What or rather whom I'm going to write about is my mum, Helen Anderson, who absolutely loved baking. And it is this love of baking that has been passed on to me. My mum. My mum was always baking. Like most children, I got allowed to 'lick the spoon' and taste the raw cake mixture. I got to learn to how to make crispie cakes. I watched how to make pancakes and enjoyed getting the first ones off the pan. I took in helpful baking hints like 'half fat to flour' for pastry or ' 4 4 4 plus 2' for the measurements of flour, sugar,  butter and eggs needed for a sponge cake or little butterfly cakes.  She had learned how to bake from her mother, as many women in her generation had done. There was always something 'in the tin' should a friend or neighbour pop in for a cup of tea. But she didn't just bake f...

2024: Week 41: Most #52Ancestorsin52Weeks

Looking at my DNA matches over various platforms and my family tree research, it is obvious to me that my paternal grandmother's line - the Walkers - are the line which have the most descendants (or at least the most descendants who have tested) and who have spread out furthest over the world. My great great grandparents James Walker (1777-1862) and Ellen Muir (1790-1866) from Linlithgow in Scotland had ten children - eight boys and two girls. Such large families were not uncommon in those times. Two of the boys never married, but between them the other eight siblings produced at least 52 grandchildren! The eldest of the siblings, George Walker was, however,  the only one of the children to ever leave Scotland and that was later in life, when he followed his son John, a miner, over to the USA. It is, however, many of the grandchildren of James and Ellen who decide to leave their homeland for the USA and for Australia. Their USA destinations included Kansas, Colorado, Ohio and Maryl...